Saturday, October 8, 2011

they are people

 "They" are people.

Some slave owners in the early years of this country considered their African slaves to be animals.  It probably made it easier for them to justify slavery.  After all, if slaves are animals, how are they any different from livestock?

But those slaves were people.

Today, protesters are camped out on Wall Street in New York speaking out against corporate greed.  I can empathize and I think the protesters are on to something.  I also believe this could be the beginning of a change in the way we do things in this society.  But I hope we don't forget that the folks who run our corporations are still people.  In fact, many of them are a lot like us.

We tend to "objectify" people we don't agree with.  It's human nature and it makes it easier to mistreat them or to point judgmental fingers.  A martial arts black belt once told me that if someone were to assault him, they would cease to be a "person" in his mind and would instead become a "target".

The problem with objectifying others is that we open the doors to treating them as something less than human, to mistreating them in the same way we may have been mistreated.  No matter what abuse we have endured, it is wrong to stoop to that level in return.  We must always remember that "they" are people like us.  The way we treat "them" says something very profound about who we really are.

Walt Kelly, the Pogo cartoonist wrote, "There is no need to sally forth, for it remains true that those things which make us human are, curiously enough, always close at hand.  Resolve, then, that on this very ground, with small flags waving and tiny blasts of tiny trumpets, we shall meet the enemy, and not only may he be ours, he may be us."  The last line later was reduced to, "We have met the enemy and he is us".


Sunday, September 18, 2011

The Technological Singularity

I was surfing the 'net the other day when I found myself overwhelmed by sheer multitude of interesting/practical websites out there!  I just can't keep up...

Once more I was reminded of the concept of the "technological singularity" (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity for a summary).

We Americans seem to be consumed by the idea that if we can have it, we should have it.  We have access to the latest gadgets, fashions, fads, etc., and they are all very tempting, but I would suggest a more constructive paradigm: we could ask ourselves, "What would a new thing (computer, car, pair of shoes, relationship) in my life say about who I really am?"  Are we to be defined more by what we have or by who we are?

Let's really bring this home: have you ever looked at the obituary page in your newspaper?  The descriptions of the recently deceased are all about who the person was, how generous they were, the organizations they belonged to, and who their surviving family members are.  Obituaries never mention how many cars they had, how much money they left to their heirs, or how fashionable they were. 

And the reason for this is very simple.  People will remember who you were a lot longer than they will remember what you had.

We can never keep up with the latest technology (or fashions or other material goods) anyway so why waste the time trying?  The answer to the issue of the Singularity is "Why is it so important to keep up?"  We don't have to, we don't really need to, and we should be focusing more on who we really are and less on what we have. 

That is where our true significance as human beings really lies.